CADE expert commission
Multiple legal schools of thought reason independently before a synthesis is allowed.
Capability layer04 / 12
Research & drafting
CADE commissions competing expert approaches, tests them against the record and prepares a cited first pass for human judgment.
Dossiers, verified citations, clause suggestions, redlines, tone matching and principal-specific work product.
The reviewer starts with a defensible work product, visible uncertainty and an embedded research team—not a blank page.
2×independent challenge passes100%citation lineage1principal-specific voice
How it works
From signal
to verified outcome.
- 01
Frame
CADE identifies the client objective, controlling questions, jurisdiction and prohibited outcomes.
↘ - 02
Research
Specialist agents acquire authority, reconcile corpus coverage and preserve source snapshots.
↘ - 03
Challenge
Adversarial panels test assumptions, alternative positions and falsification conditions.
↘ - 04
Draft
A cited first pass arrives with open questions, review burden and live research support.
↘
System capabilities
Depth beneath
the interface.
Verified source binder
Every material proposition links to authority, coverage status and a sealed source snapshot.
Review-side terminal
Re-open research, challenge a conclusion or commission a new angle without leaving the work product.
Principal model
Draft structure, tone, risk posture and editing preferences learn from accepted outcomes.
Connected by design
Your systems remain
where work happens.
Apparently adds a permission-aware execution layer across the tools your organization already trusts.Microsoft WordconnectedOutlookconnectedWestlawconnectedLexisNexisconnectedvLexconnectedCourtListenerconnectediManageconnectedNetDocumentsconnected
Open the system